Gregory Richardson v. Doe Clerk, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: GREGORY RICHARDSON, an individual
Respondent / Appellee: DOE, of the Riverside Superior Court, in their official capacity, DOES, of the Riverside Superior Court, in their official Capacities, IVAMS, INC., a California Corporation, PETER EGGERTSEN, President of IVAMS, as the temporary judge pursuant to Art. VI, 21 and CRC Rule 2.831, DOES, California State Bar Doe Attorneys in their official capacities and DOES, California Commission on Juidicial Performance Does in their official capacities
Case Number: 21-55744
Filed: July 15, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2021 Filing 15 Streamlined request [14] by Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12224762] (BG) [Entered: 09/09/2021 04:24 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson. New requested due date is 10/08/2021. [12223792] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 09/08/2021 10:25 PM]
August 30, 2021 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Motion to take judicial notice of The decisional law of cases from the United States Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court and courts of appeal. Date of service: 08/30/2021. [12215620] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/30/2021 03:38 PM]
August 27, 2021 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Motion to take judicial notice of The filing and entry of the Harmon Orders (December 8, 2014) (R:0121-0136)--but not the contents therein. Date of service: 08/27/2021. [12214052] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:07 PM]
August 27, 2021 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees Does and Doe reply to response (). Date of service: 08/27/2021. [12213278] [21-55744] (Overton, Sarah) [Entered: 08/27/2021 09:50 AM]
August 26, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Corrected Motion to take judicial notice of The fact that Martha Bellinger is not a judge (refiled with exhibits). Date of service: 08/26/2021. [12212424] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:35 PM]
August 26, 2021 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Motion to take judicial notice of The fact that Martha Bellinger is not a real judge under the California Constitution.. Date of service: 08/26/2021. [12212391] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:03 PM]
August 25, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Motion to take judicial notice of Local Rule 5145 of the Riverside Superior Court which is applicable via Art. VI, Sec. 21 of the California Constitution and the mandatory Stipulation (R:0024-0029). Date of service: 08/25/2021. [12211696] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/25/2021 03:54 PM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Corrected Motion to take judicial notice of The provisions of Cal. Const., Article VI, Section 21. Date of service: 08/24/2021. [12209994] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/24/2021 12:16 PM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson Motion to take judicial notice of California Constitution, Article VI, Section 21. Date of service: 08/24/2021. [12209594] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/24/2021 08:44 AM]
August 20, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Gregory Richardson response to motion ([ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/20/2021. [12206985] [21-55744] (Richardson, Gregory) [Entered: 08/20/2021 10:33 AM]
August 13, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Doe and Does Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 08/13/2021. [12201231] [21-55744] (Frazier-Krane, Lindsay) [Entered: 08/13/2021 02:37 PM]
August 13, 2021 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Lindsay N. Frazier-Krane for party(s) Appellee Doe Appellee Does, in case 21-55744. [12201200] (JFF) [Entered: 08/13/2021 02:25 PM]
August 13, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lindsay N. Frazier-Krane (Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho 3801 University Avenue, Suite 560, Riverside, CA 92508) for Appellees Doe, Does, Does and Does. Date of service: 08/13/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12201112] [21-55744] (Frazier-Krane, Lindsay) [Entered: 08/13/2021 01:52 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gregory Richardson opening brief due 09/08/2021. Appellees Doe, Does, Peter Eggertsen and IVAMS, Inc. answering brief due 10/08/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12173398] (JBS) [Entered: 07/15/2021 11:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gregory Richardson v. Doe Clerk, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: GREGORY RICHARDSON, an individual
Represented By: Gregory Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DOE, of the Riverside Superior Court, in their official capacity
Represented By: Sarah Lee Overton
Represented By: Lindsay N. Frazier-Krane Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DOES, of the Riverside Superior Court, in their official Capacities
Represented By: Sarah Lee Overton
Represented By: Lindsay N. Frazier-Krane Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: IVAMS, INC., a California Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: PETER EGGERTSEN, President of IVAMS, as the temporary judge pursuant to Art. VI, 21 and CRC Rule 2.831
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DOES, California State Bar Doe Attorneys in their official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DOES, California Commission on Juidicial Performance Does in their official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?