Lydia Olson, et al v. State of California, et al
| LYDIA OLSON, MIGUEL PEREZ, POSTMATES, INC., (Successor Postmates LLC) and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA and XAVIER BECERRA, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California |
| 21-55757 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 LYDIA OLSON, ET AL V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL
|
|
OLSON V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, DANIELLE J. FORREST and MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.) In Appeal No. 20-55267, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc., and Uber Technologies, Inc., challenge the denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction, which sought to enjoin enforcement of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019). That appeal was argued and submitted for decision on November 18, 2020. On July 16, 2021, the district court dismissed Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint with prejudice. Appellants filed a timely appeal of the dismissal (Appeal No. 21-55757). Appellants now seek to consolidate the merits appeal with the preliminary injunction appeal and to limit briefing on the merits. Appellees, the State of California and Xavier Becerra, oppose consolidation and move to dismiss the preliminary injunction appeal as moot....Having consolidated the appeals, a majority of the panel has voted to grant the motion to dismiss as moot the separate preliminary injunction appeal. Judge Forrest would deny the motion to dismiss. If the district courts dismissal order is reversed, the panel will address the issue of whether the preliminary injunction was properly denied, in accordance with our precedent. See Nationwide Biweekly Admin., 873 F.3d at 731 (describing this procedure). IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE ORDE FOR FULL TEXT) [12230428] (OC) [Entered: 09/16/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 12/17/2021. Date of service: 09/14/2021. [12228098] [21-55757] (Evangelis, Theane) [Entered: 09/14/2021 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. opening brief due 10/18/2021. Appellees Xavier Becerra and State of California answering brief due 11/17/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12207406] (JN) [Entered: 08/20/2021 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. New requested due date is 10/18/2021. [12207235] [21-55757] (Evangelis, Theane) [Entered: 08/20/2021 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. reply to response (). Date of service: 08/02/2021. [12189593] [21-55757] (Evangelis, Theane) [Entered: 08/02/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Xavier Becerra and State of California response to motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/02/2021. [12189032] [21-55757] (Zelidon-Zepeda, Jose) [Entered: 08/02/2021 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/27/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12184193]. [21-55757] (AD) [Entered: 07/27/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/27/2021. [12183797] [21-55757] (Evangelis, Theane) [Entered: 07/27/2021 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. Motion to consolidate cases 20-55267. Date of service: 07/20/2021. [12177968] [21-55757] (Evangelis, Theane) [Entered: 07/20/2021 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/27/2021. Appellants Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. opening brief due 09/17/2021. Appellees Xavier Becerra and State of California answering brief due 10/18/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12177605] (JBS) [Entered: 07/20/2021 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
