Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
| MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr. |
| U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JENKINS, Warden |
| 21-55771 |
| July 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr. letter re: Miscellaneous documents. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12228983] (QDL) [Entered: 09/15/2021 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr. letter re: Miscellaneous documents. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12225780] (QDL) [Entered: 09/10/2021 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr. letter re: Miscellanous documents. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12223740] (QDL) [Entered: 09/08/2021 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr. letter re: List of lyrics. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12206557] (QDL) [Entered: 08/19/2021 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 07/28/2021. [12185363] (BY) [Entered: 07/28/2021 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12183167] (CKP) [Entered: 07/26/2021 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar Sr. opening brief due 09/23/2021. [12179018] (RT) [Entered: 07/21/2021 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
