Elena Livenson v. Aeronautical Radio, Inc., et al
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business in California |
ELENA LIVENSON |
AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC., Erroneously Sued As Rockwell Collins, Inc. |
21-55800 |
July 28, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
ELENA LIVENSON V. AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC., ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ] in No. 21-55800 and Docket Entry No. [ # 12223800-2 ] in No. 21-55888) to consolidate Nos. 21-55800 and 21-55888 is granted. The request to amend the due date for filing the transcript designation order in No. 21-55888 (included within Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is denied as moot. The transcript designation order for No. 21-55888 was filed on September 14, 2021. The consolidated opening brief is due November 26, 2021. The consolidated answering brief is due December 27, 2021. The consolidated optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [12230171] [21-55800, 21-55888] (AF) [Entered: 09/16/2021 09:34 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Elena Livenson Correspondence: Supplemental Declaration of Greg May in Support of Motion to Consolidate Appeals (re Appellee's Non-Opposition) - related to Docket No. 8. Date of service: 09/10/2021 [12225947] [21-55800] (May, Gregory) [Entered: 09/10/2021 04:48 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Elena Livenson Motion to consolidate cases 21-55800 and 21-5888. Date of service: 09/09/2021. [12223799] [21-55800] (May, Gregory) [Entered: 09/09/2021 01:15 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (SMC): Appeal No. 21-55888 is under consideration for inclusion in the Mediation Program. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. A dial-in assessment conference in appeal no. 21-55888 will be held in conjunction with appeal no. 21-55800 on September 29, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. In all other respects, the courts order of August 5, 2021, shall govern. [12214973] [21-55800, 21-55888] (AF) [Entered: 08/30/2021 11:11 AM] |
Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Kiran A. Seldon for party(s) Appellee Aeronautical Radio, Inc., in case 21-55800. [12195329] (DJV) [Entered: 08/09/2021 10:43 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kiran Aftab Seldon (Seyfarth Shaw LLP, 2029 Century Park East, Suiten 3500, Los Angeles, CA 90067; (310) 277-7200) for Appellee Aeronautical Radio, Inc.. Date of service: 08/09/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12195317] [21-55800] (Seldon, Kiran) [Entered: 08/09/2021 10:38 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/29/2021, 12:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12193450] (CL) [Entered: 08/05/2021 04:15 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/04/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12192554]. [21-55800] (AD) [Entered: 08/05/2021 06:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Elena Livenson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/04/2021. [12192507] [21-55800] (May, Gregory) [Entered: 08/04/2021 08:22 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Elena Livenson Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/04/2021. Transcript ordered by 08/26/2021. Transcript due 09/27/2021. Appellant Elena Livenson opening brief due 11/04/2021. Appellee Aeronautical Radio, Inc. answering brief due 12/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12185871] (RT) [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Elena Livenson v. Aeronautical Radio, Inc., et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: ELENA LIVENSON | |
Represented By: | Gregory May |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC., Erroneously Sued As Rockwell Collins, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy L. Hix |
Represented By: | Kiran A. Seldon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business in California | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.