Amos Jackson v. Ken Clark
| AMOS JACKSON |
| KEN CLARK, Warden |
| 21-55849 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Amos Jackson Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 08/18/2021. [12204521] [21-55849] (Marshall, Marilee) [Entered: 08/18/2021 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/02/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12196116] (JPD) [Entered: 08/09/2021 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Amos Jackson v. Ken Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: AMOS JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | Marilee Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: KEN CLARK, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Matthew Krauss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
