Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALAN DOUGLAS
Defendant / Appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk
Case Number: 21-55886
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2022 Filing 26 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-6617 Filed on: 12/10/2021 Cert Petition Action 1: Dismissed, 02/22/2022 [12378531] (RR) [Entered: 02/23/2022 05:51 PM]
January 30, 2022 Filing 25 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Correspondence/Letter: Appellant Alan Douglas filed Correspondence/Letter to USCA for 9th Circuit case No.:21-55886 and USSC Case 21-6617 LETTER by Supreme Court to Appellant Alan Douglas. For Clarification Appellant ask USSC to settle the Case.. Date of service: 01/30/2022 [12355389] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 01/30/2022 07:55 PM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Correspondence/Letter to USCA for 9th Circuit Case 21-55886 and USSC Case 21-6617 NOTICE by Supreme Court of the United States to Opposing Counsel that the Case 21-6617 was Docketed. For Clarification attached Appendices incl. GF Settlement.. Date of service: 12/28/2021 [12326188] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 12/28/2021 01:54 PM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 23 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Appellant Alan Douglas filed Correspondence/Letter to USCA for 9th CircuitCase Number 21-55886 a courtesy copy of a Motion for Appointment of pro bono Counsel for Mediation.. Date of service: 12/20/2021 [12319946] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 12/20/2021 05:16 AM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Appellant Alan Douglas filed Correspondence/Letter to UDCA for the 9th Circuit Case 21-55886 a courtesy Copy of an Emergency Application for Injunction Pending Certiorari Review to the US Supreme Court.. Date of service: 12/20/2021 [12319945] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 12/20/2021 03:57 AM]
December 16, 2021 Filing 21 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 21-6617 Filed on: 12/10/2021 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [12318589] (RR) [Entered: 12/16/2021 04:45 PM]
December 11, 2021 Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Correspondence: Appellant Alan Douglas filed Correspondence/Letter to USCA for 9th Circuit Case 21-55886 a courtesy Copy of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the US Supreme Court. Date of service: 12/11/2021 [12313319] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 12/11/2021 02:34 AM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 19 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDH, PJW and KKL) [12309371] (NAC) [Entered: 12/08/2021 07:25 AM]
November 30, 2021 Filing 18 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) The motion for reconsideration en banc (Docket Entry No. [ # 14 ]) is denied on behalf of the court. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11. All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [12301640] (JBS) [Entered: 11/30/2021 03:08 PM]
October 13, 2021 Filing 17 Received Appellant Alan Douglas miscellaneous notice. [12256493] (NAC) [Entered: 10/14/2021 07:51 AM]
October 2, 2021 Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas EMERGENCY Motion for injunction pending appeal. Date of service: 10/02/2021. [12245769] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 10/02/2021 12:52 AM]
September 28, 2021 Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Urgent Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. Date of service: 09/28/2021. [12242140] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:11 PM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas motion for reconsideration en banc of dispositive Judge Order of 09/16/2021. Date of service: 09/20/2021. [12233359] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [13].]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 09/23/2021 by SLM] (TYL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 01:58 PM]
September 20, 2021 Filing 13 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 14 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas petition for rehearing en banc (from 09/16/2021 opinion). Date of service: 09/20/2021. [12232511] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 09/20/2021 03:24 AM]
September 17, 2021 Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Alan Douglas. Date of service: 09/17/2021. [12231141] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 09/17/2021 01:57 AM]
September 16, 2021 Filing 11 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 12, 2021 notice of appeal was not filed within 180 days after the district courts final order entered on December 17, 2020, and no earlier notice of appeal was filed in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1007 (9th Cir. 2012) ([w]here there is no separate judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii), we deem the entry of judgment to be 150 days after the entry of an appealable final order.). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12230714] (JPD) [Entered: 09/16/2021 02:29 PM]
September 15, 2021 Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Alan Douglas. Date of service: 09/15/2021. [12229892] [21-55886]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF file of "tab 7". 09/17/2021 by SML] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 09/15/2021 07:27 PM]
September 3, 2021 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Supplemental Motion to supplement or amend motion to supplement or amend Mediation Questionnaire, Motion to refer case to mediation. Date of service: 09/03/2021. [12220569] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 09/03/2021 04:39 PM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/30/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12215955]. [21-55886] (AD) [Entered: 08/31/2021 06:44 AM]
August 30, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/30/2021. [12215909] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 08/30/2021 08:22 PM]
August 27, 2021 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/26/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12213016]. [21-55886] (AD) [Entered: 08/27/2021 06:44 AM]
August 26, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/26/2021. [12212996] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 08/26/2021 10:59 PM]
August 25, 2021 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-55886: IFP Pending In COA] ). [12210802] (NAC) [Entered: 08/25/2021 08:56 AM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 08/24/2021. [12210758] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [2] .] (TYL) [Entered: 08/25/2021 08:38 AM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 3 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Alan Douglas reply to response to Court order dated 08/18/2021. Date of service: 08/24/2021. [12210646] [21-55886] (Douglas, Alan) [Entered: 08/24/2021 10:37 PM]
August 18, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alan Douglas opening brief due 10/12/2021. [12204926] (JMR) [Entered: 08/18/2021 01:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ALAN DOUGLAS
Represented By: Alan Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?