Lisa Kim v. Tinder, Inc., et al
| LISA KIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| TINDER, INC., a Delaware corporation, MATCH GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MATCH GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| 21-55951 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: KS) In an order filed October 28, 2021, this appeal was administratively closed. The appeal is reopened. The unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice (Docket Entry No. [ # 12 ]) is granted. Pursuant to the terms of the parties' stipulation, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to reinstatement in the event there is an order by the district court denying final approval of the Amended Class Action Settlement or an order by this Court reversing any grant of final approval. Reinstatement shall be by notice filed by any party in this court and served on the other parties and the Circuit Mediator within 28 days of an order by the district court denying final approval of the Amended Class Action Settlement or an order by this Court reversing any grant of final approval. If no notice of reinstatement is filed and served, the appeal will be deemed dismissed with prejudice. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12390639] (OC) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: OC): Pursuant to this Court's order [ # 8 ] and appellees' motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [ # 12 ], this case is ordered re-opened. [12390635] (OC) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellees Match Group, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Tinder, Inc. Stipulated Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 03/03/2022. [12385919] [21-55951] (Brown, Donald) [Entered: 03/03/2022 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lisa Kim Stipulated Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 02/28/2022. [12382501]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [10].] (SLM) [Entered: 02/28/2022 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 11 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Lisa Kim Correspondence: STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF APPEAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date of service: 02/28/2022 [12382490] [21-55951] (Friedman, Todd) [Entered: 02/28/2022 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 03/15/2022. The administrative closure period is extended until 03/28/2022. At any time before that date, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. See order for details. [12358079] (CL) [Entered: 02/01/2022 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: KS) The Clerk is directed to temporarily close this courts docket for administrative purposes until January 27, 2022. This administrative closure is not a decision on the merits and no mandate will issue in connection with this order. At any time, any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened. On or before January 27, 2022, counsel are requested to contact the mediator (kay_suk@ca9.uscourts.gov) to report on the status of the case. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. [12271870] (OC) [Entered: 10/28/2021 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/27/2021, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12243309] (CL) [Entered: 09/29/2021 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the challenged order may not be final or appealable. See 9 U.S.C. 16; Ventress v. Japan Airlines, 486 F.3d 1111, 1119 (9th Cir. 2007) (dismissing appeal of interlocutory order compelling arbitration for lack of jurisdiction); Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005) ([A] district court order staying judicial proceedings and compelling arbitration is not appealable . . . .). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12241644] (OC) [Entered: 09/28/2021 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/13/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12227263]. [21-55951] (AD) [Entered: 09/13/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lisa Kim Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/13/2021. [12226835] [21-55951] (Friedman, Todd) [Entered: 09/13/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Benjamin G. Shatz for party(s) Appellee Match Group, Inc. Appellee Match Group, LLC Appellee Tinder, Inc.. [12223684] (RL) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Benjamin G. Shatz (Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90067) for Appellees Tinder, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Match Group, Inc.. Date of service: 09/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12223629] [21-55951] (Shatz, Benjamin) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lisa Kim Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/09/2021. Transcript ordered by 09/30/2021. Transcript due 10/28/2021. Appellant Lisa Kim opening brief due 12/08/2021. Appellees Match Group, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Tinder, Inc. answering brief due 01/10/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12218885] (RT) [Entered: 09/02/2021 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lisa Kim v. Tinder, Inc., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LISA KIM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Adrian Bacon Esquire |
| Represented By: | Todd M. Friedman |
| Represented By: | Thomas Edward Wheeler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TINDER, INC., a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Donald Brown |
| Represented By: | Robert H. Platt |
| Represented By: | Benjamin G. Shatz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MATCH GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Donald Brown |
| Represented By: | Robert H. Platt |
| Represented By: | Benjamin G. Shatz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MATCH GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Donald Brown |
| Represented By: | Robert H. Platt |
| Represented By: | Benjamin G. Shatz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
