La Dell Grizzell, et al v. San Elijo Elementary School, et al
| JOHN DOE, Minor # 1; Minor # 2, Minor # 3 |
| LA DELL GRIZZELL |
| SAN ELIJO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL and SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| 21-55956 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant La Dell Grizzell supplemental application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 10/10/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12264907] (RL) [Entered: 10/21/2021 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant La Dell Grizzell letter dated 10/10/2021 re: Status request of pending motion. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent copoy of docket sheet) [12263709] (RL) [Entered: 10/20/2021 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant La Dell Grizzell opening brief of 13 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/19/2021. (briefing remains stayed, motion for IFP pending) [12261736] (KWG) [Entered: 10/19/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant La Dell Grizzell FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/13/2021. [12237164] (RL) [Entered: 09/23/2021 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant La Dell Grizzell opening brief due 11/03/2021. Appellees San Elijo Elementary School and San Marcos Unified School District answering brief due 12/03/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12219354] (RT) [Entered: 09/02/2021 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
