Charles Allen v. Ralph Diaz, et al
| CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN |
| RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, MARTINEZ, Food Manager, TRAVIS, Supervising Cook, J. LYON, Food Manager and W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden |
| 21-55970 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Charles Edward Allen document entitled "Application for extension of time to file FRAP 41 unitl 11/15/2021". Deficiencies: None. [12270914] (RR) [Entered: 10/27/2021 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDH, PJW and KKL) [12251773] (QDL) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district courts September 3, 2021 granted appellants motion for reconsideration, vacated the judgment challenged in this appeal, and reopened the case. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Because the action is still pending in the district court, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12230845] (JBS) [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received Appellant Charles Edward Allen notice of appeal. [12223741] (QDL) [Entered: 09/08/2021 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Charles Edward Allen opening brief due 11/01/2021. [12221742] (JPD) [Entered: 09/07/2021 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
