Anibal Silva v. Midland Mortgage, et al
| ANIBAL SILVA |
| MIDLAND MORTGAGE, MIDFIRST BANK, KEN CLARK, DARLENE C. VIGIL, ROD DANIELSON, CRYSTAL BAKER and GEORGE RECORDS |
| 21-56057 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellant Anibal Silva to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Anibal Silva opening brief due 12/29/2021. Appellees Crystal Baker, Rod Danielson, Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage, George Records, Darlene C. Vigil and Ken Clark answering brief due 01/28/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12297398] (JN) [Entered: 11/24/2021 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Anibal Silva. New requested due date is 12/29/2021. [12297317] [21-56057] (Silva, Anibal) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anibal Silva Correspondence: Notice of Record Complete and Defendants/Appellees' Failure to File a Designation of Contents or Record on Appeal. Date of service: 10/27/2021 [12270055] [21-56057] (Silva, Anibal) [Entered: 10/27/2021 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 COURT CORRECTION: Appellee Ken Clark in 21-56057 substituted by Appellee Ken Clark in 21-56057 [12242018] (SLM) [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anibal Silva opening brief due 11/29/2021. Appellees Crystal Baker, Ken Clark, Warden, Rod Danielson, Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage, George Records and Darlene C. Vigil answering brief due 12/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12241855] (RT) [Entered: 09/28/2021 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
