Palomar Health v. American Guarantee and Liabili, et al
| PALOMAR HEALTH |
| AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY and MORGAN JACKSON |
| 21-56073 |
| October 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12279510] (CL) [Entered: 11/05/2021 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Laurie J. Hepler for party(s) Appellee American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company Appellee Morgan Jackson, in case 21-56073. [12276769] (NAC) [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Laurie J. Hepler (Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP, 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Fl., Los Angeles, CA 90036) for Appellees American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and Morgan Jackson. Date of service: 11/03/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12276766] [21-56073] (Hepler, Laurie) [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellant Palomar Health to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Palomar Health opening brief due 12/30/2021. Appellees American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and Morgan Jackson answering brief due 01/31/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12266524] (JN) [Entered: 10/22/2021 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Palomar Health. New requested due date is 12/30/2021. [12265253] [21-56073] (Kozdrey, Cheryl) [Entered: 10/22/2021 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/01/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12259980] (CL) [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:20 PM] |
Filing 4
The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/06/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12249376]. [21-56073] (AD) [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
Filed (ECF) Appellant Palomar Health Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/06/2021. [12249296] [21-56073] (Kozdrey, Cheryl) [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:05 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-56073: Paid] ). Receipt number: ACASDC-16185601. [12245418] (RT) [Entered: 10/01/2021 03:36 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Palomar Health Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/08/2021. Appellant Palomar Health opening brief due 11/30/2021. Appellees American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and Morgan Jackson answering brief due 12/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12245404] (RT) [Entered: 10/01/2021 03:32 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
