Raymond Bradford v. P. Bracamonte, et al
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD |
P. BRACAMONTE, Facility C Captain, W. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant, L. STEEL, Correctional Officer, J. DURAN, Correctional Offficer, S. ESHO, Correctional Officer, R. CASAS, Correctional Officer, F. AVILES, Correctional Officer, S. CUTOR, Correctional Officer, A. SHEPPARD, Sergeant, R. SEGOVIA, Correctional Sergeant, D. PARAMO, Warden, M. VOONG, Director of Office of Appeals, S. SENGSOURYA, Licensed Vocational Nurse - LVN, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, P. COVELLO, Warden, E. ORTIZ, Correctional Lieutenant, NGUYEN THIEN HOANG, Dr., VAN HOESEN KAREN BETH, Dr., UC - SAN DIEGO HEALTH, T. LEMON, Warden and GONZALES, Representative; CSR-Classification Staff |
21-56087 |
October 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the 10/14/2021 order of the court in response to the letter of request received on 11/29/2021. [12300104] (JR) [Entered: 11/29/2021 02:55 PM] |
Filing 6 Received Appellant Raymond Alford Bradford notice regarding ex parte application and request for copy of docket sheet and status of case. Deficiencies: No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. [12299841] (NAC) [Entered: 11/29/2021 01:49 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Raymond Alford Bradford motion to proceed under 28 U.S.C.. Deficiencies: No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. [12299117] (NAC) [Entered: 11/28/2021 08:02 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NAC): The mandate issued on 11/05/2021 is recalled as issued in error. [12279206] (NAC) [Entered: 11/05/2021 08:42 AM] |
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMM, WAF and JSB) [12279163] (NAC) [Entered: 11/05/2021 07:36 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed October 1, 2021 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 08-80078. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 21-56087 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Southern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [12257143] (JPD) [Entered: 10/14/2021 01:03 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 08-80078. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12248097] (RT) [Entered: 10/05/2021 02:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.