Raymonda Singleton v. SDG&E, et al
| RAYMONDA SINGLETON |
| SDG&E, COX INTERNET, ALLCONNECT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, STEVEN LEE PROPERTIES, NAVAJO BLUFFS, R.V. MANAGEMENT, KAISER HOSPITAL, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD and BAY VISTA HOUSING PARTNERS |
| 21-56108 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Personal Injury-Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, CMC and DPC) [12554238] (DJV) [Entered: 10/03/2022 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Raymonda Singleton motion for recons of court's 7/13/22 Panel order titled pfr eb. Deficiencies: No further filings per XX order. Served on 08/15/2022. [12528656] (DJV) [Entered: 08/29/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Raymonda Singleton letter dated 07/19/2022 re: document addressing defendants. Paper filing deficiencies: case closed, no further filings per 07/13/2022 order. [12499531] (QDL) [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS): The district court certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). On November 4, 2021, the court ordered appellant to explain in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). Upon a review of the record, the response to the courts November 4, 2021 order, and the opening brief filed on December 8, 2021, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [12492850] (AF) [Entered: 07/13/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Raymonda Singleton opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/06/2021. (motions to proceed IFP and appointment of counsel pending, briefing remains stayed) [12310268] (KWG) [Entered: 12/08/2021 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Raymonda Singleton motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/05/2021. [12309957] (DJV) [Entered: 12/08/2021 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Raymonda Singleton response statement that appeal should go forward; Served on 12/06/2021. [12309953] (DJV) [Entered: 12/08/2021 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12278472] (CKP) [Entered: 11/04/2021 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Raymonda Singleton motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/14/2021. [12259670] (QDL) [Entered: 10/18/2021 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymonda Singleton opening brief due 12/13/2021. [12255155] (JMR) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
