Guillermo Beltran, et al v. Inter-Con Security Sys., Inc., et al
| GUILLERMO BELTRAN, LUIS JIMENEZ, FRANK ANICOCHE, Jr., LOUIS DAWKINS, PAGANINI LOUISSAINT, JOSHUA BOLDEN and RUDY DELAO, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, Jr. and DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 21-56139 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: WL) The parties have jointly filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. (Dkt. [ # 23 ].) That motion is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED. See FED. R. APP. P. 42(b). The parties shall each bear their own costs on appeal. This order constitutes the mandate of this court. [12479724] (WL) [Entered: 06/24/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 24 Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, August 5, 2022 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Check # here for updates on the status of reopening as the hearing date approaches. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination . The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Friday, August 5, 2022. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12453175]. [21-56139] (KS) [Entered: 05/22/2022 06:09 AM] |
| Filing 23 Filed (ECF) Appellants Frank Anicoche, Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Luis Jimenez and Paganini Louissaint Joint Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 05/20/2022. [12452503] [21-56139] (Rodriguez, Yesenia) [Entered: 05/20/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 22 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for August 2022 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12423963]. [21-56139] (KS) [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 21 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 17 ] filed by Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. [12412052] (SD) [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 20 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 18 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. [12411688] (CPA) [Entered: 04/04/2022 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 19 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 17 ] submitted by Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 18 ] submitted by Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12406585] (JMR) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. Date of service: 03/23/2022. [12403271] [21-56139]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 03/28/2022 by JMR] (Sholkoff, Jack) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 17 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. Date of service: 03/23/2022. [12403249] [21-56139]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 03/28/2022 by JMR] (Sholkoff, Jack) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Motion [ # 15 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellee to extend time to file the answering brief. The appellees' answering brief is due 03/24/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). [12364848] (TH) [Entered: 02/09/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 03/24/2022. Date of service: 02/08/2022. [12364589] [21-56139] (Sholkoff, Jack) [Entered: 02/08/2022 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 14 Streamlined request [13] by Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Does, Enrique Hernandez Jr. and Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. answering brief due 02/22/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12337068] (JN) [Entered: 01/11/2022 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. New requested due date is 02/18/2022. [12336668] [21-56139] (Sholkoff, Jack) [Entered: 01/10/2022 06:10 PM] |
| Filing 12 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 8 ] filed by Appellants. [12323047] (SD) [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 11 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 9 ] in 5 volume(s) and index volume filed by Appellants. [12322974] (KT) [Entered: 12/22/2021 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 8 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 9 ] submitted by appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12321616] (KWG) [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Frank Anicoche, Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Luis Jimenez and Paganini Louissaint. Date of service: 12/17/2021. [12319218] [21-56139]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of the excerpts, vols 1-5 and index vol. 12/21/2021 by KWG] (Rodriguez, Yesenia) [Entered: 12/17/2021 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Frank Anicoche, Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Luis Jimenez and Paganini Louissaint. Date of service: 12/17/2021. [12319178] [21-56139]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of the brief. 12/21/2021 by KWG] (Rodriguez, Yesenia) [Entered: 12/17/2021 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12290063] (VS) [Entered: 11/17/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN Assessment Conference, 11/17/2021, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12275257] (LW) [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/22/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12266578]. [21-56139] (AD) [Entered: 10/22/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Jack Steven Sholkoff for party(s) Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., in case 21-56139. [12266474] (JFF) [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jack S. Sholkoff (OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.) for Appellee Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.. Date of service: 10/22/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12266428] [21-56139] (Sholkoff, Jack) [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Frank Anicoche, Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Paganini Louissaint and Luis Jimenez Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/22/2021. [12265791] [21-56139] (Rodriguez, Yesenia) [Entered: 10/22/2021 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Frank Anicoche Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Luis Jimenez and Paganini Louissaint Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/25/2021. Appellants Frank Anicoche Jr., Guillermo Beltran, Joshua Bolden, Louis Dawkins, Rudy Delao, Luis Jimenez and Paganini Louissaint opening brief due 12/20/2021. Appellees Does, Enrique Hernandez Jr. and Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. answering brief due 01/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12260071] (RT) [Entered: 10/18/2021 01:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
