Lamont Karriem v. County of Riverside, et al
| LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM |
| COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside, SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, County of Riverside, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, County of Riverside, JOHN W. VINEYARD, Presiding Judge; in his personal capacity, JOHN W. MONTEROSSO, Asst Presiding Judge; in his personal capacity, ERIC A. KEEN, Judge; in his personal capacity, RANDALL D. WHITE, Judge; in his personal capacity, CHAD BIANCO, Sheriff; in his personal capacity, ROBERT GUNZEL, Asst Sheriff; in his personal capacity, EDWARD DELGADO, Correctional Chief Deputy, in his personal capacity, MICHAEL A. HESTRIN, District Attorney; in his personal capacity, JOHN AKI, Chief Asst. District Attorney, in his personal capacity, JEANNE ROY, Asst District Attorney, in her personal capacity, MAUREEN A. DUMOUCHEL, Deputy District Attorney, in her personal capacity, STEVEN L. HARMON, Public Defender; in his personal capacity, BRIAN L. BOLES, Asst Public Defender; in his personal capacity, THOMAS M. CAVANAUGH, Asst Public Defender; in her personal capacity, TRACI D. LUIS, Deputy Public Defender, in her personal capacity, MELISSA C. HALE, Deputy Public Defender, in her personal capacity and DOES, 1-3, Inclusive |
| 21-56180 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 12/09/2021. [12321254] (RL) [Entered: 12/20/2021 05:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12279857] (RT) [Entered: 11/05/2021 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem addendum to motion and affidavit for leave to appeal in forma pauperis 28 USC 1915. Dated 10/26/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12276202] (RL) [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem motion and affidavit for leave to appeal in forma pauperis 28 USC 1915. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/26/2021. [12272185] (RL) [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12267642] (CKP) [Entered: 10/25/2021 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lamont Garner Karriem opening brief due 12/27/2021. [12267332] (RT) [Entered: 10/25/2021 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
