Scholz Recycling GmbH, et al v. Zhou Yizhou, et al
| SCHOLZ RECYCLING GMBH and SCHOLZ HONG KONG LIMITED |
| ZHOU YIZHOU, individually, and as Trustee of the Zhou and Liu Family Trust, LIU QINGXIAN, individually, and as Trustee of the Zhou and Liu Family Trust, ZHOU YUAN, OUTER MARINO INVESTMENTS, LLC, STAR ACHIEVEMENTS CORPORATION and DOES, 1-100 inclusive |
| 21-56205 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Arbitration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12318452] (AF) [Entered: 12/16/2021 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants Scholz Hong Kong Limited and Scholz Recycling GmbH Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 12/10/2021. [12312980] [21-56205] (Khan, Amman) [Entered: 12/10/2021 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12311625] (VS) [Entered: 12/09/2021 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/06/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12294458] (VS) [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)); see also Est. of Bishop v. Bechtel Power Corp., 905 F.2d 1272, 1274 (9th Cir. 1990) [T]he denial of a motion to remand is not a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291.). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12293057] (AF) [Entered: 11/19/2021 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/08/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12282039]. [21-56205] (AD) [Entered: 11/08/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Scholz Recycling GmbH and Scholz Hong Kong Limited Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/08/2021. [12281870] [21-56205] (Khan, Amman) [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Scholz Hong Kong Limited and Scholz Recycling GmbH Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/08/2021. Transcript ordered by 11/29/2021. Transcript due 12/28/2021. Appellants Scholz Hong Kong Limited and Scholz Recycling GmbH opening brief due 02/07/2022. Appellees Outer Marino Investments, LLC, liu Qingxian, Star Achievements Corporation, Zhou Yizhou and Zhou Yuan answering brief due 03/08/2022. Appellants' optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12274232] (HH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
