Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
| RAUL ARELLANO |
| DANIEL PARAMO, Warden |
| 21-56214 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MARK J. BENNETT): This appeal is from the denial of appellants Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. Based on the sworn statements in appellants November 29, 2021 notice of appeal, this appeal is deemed timely filed as of May 5, 2021. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied because appellant has not shown that (1) jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion and, (2) jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the underlying section [2254 petition] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. United States v. Winkles, 795 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (order). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12320653] (AF) [Entered: 12/20/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Raul Arellano motion for Court of Appeals to consider these answers as a response to Defendant's decision to not issue COA. Deficiencies: None. [12300194] (NAC) [Entered: 11/29/2021 03:20 PM] |
Filing 2
Received copy of District Court order filed on 11/04/2021. The Certificate of Appealability as to ECF No. 191 is denied. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/4/2021. [12279365] (NAC) [Entered: 11/05/2021 10:03 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12276275] (RT) [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RAUL ARELLANO | |
| Represented By: | Raul Arellano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden | |
| Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
