Dominique Daniels v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., et al
| DOMINIQUE LASHON DANIELS |
| G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS USA, INC., FKA Wackenhut Corporation, DOVE CANYON MASTER ASSOCIATION, SEABREEZE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., VINCE GUARINO and ANTHONI D. KING III |
| 21-56227 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MF) Appellants motion for dismissal of this appeal is granted (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]). This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). All other pending motions are denied as moot. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12295131] (OC) [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Dominique Lashon Daniels motion to dismiss appeal (FORM 27). Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/09/2021. [12290978] (RR) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Dominique Lashon Daniels motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/18/2021. [12281409] (RT) [Entered: 11/08/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dominique Lashon Daniels opening brief due 01/10/2022. Appellees Dove Canyon Master Association, G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Vince Guarino, Anthoni D. King III and Seabreeze Management Company, Inc. answering brief due 02/10/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12281390] (RT) [Entered: 11/08/2021 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
