Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee: R. BLAHNIK
Case Number: 21-56249
Filed: November 16, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 2, 2024 RAUL ARELLANO V. R. BLAHNIK

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2022 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Raul Arellano motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12337286]--[Edited 01/11/2022 by JFF] (JFF) [Entered: 01/11/2022 11:04 AM]
January 7, 2022 Filing 5 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12334789] (CKP) [Entered: 01/07/2022 03:26 PM]
January 4, 2022 Filing 4 Attorneys Carson Richard Niello, Sylvie Snyder and Quyen Thai in 21-56249 substituted by Attorneys Anne M. Kammer, Anne M. Kammer and Anne M. Kammer in 21-56249 [12331155] (JFF) [Entered: 01/04/2022 03:59 PM]
January 4, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Anne Miers Kammer (California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800, San Diego, California, 92101) for Appellee R. Blahnik. Substitution for Mrs. Sylvie Snyder, Esquire for Appellee R. Blahnik, Quyen Thai for Appellee R. Blahnik and Mr. Carson Richard Niello for Appellee R. Blahnik. Date of service: 01/04/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12331004] [21-56249] (Kammer, Anne) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:49 PM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12290886] (JFF) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:17 PM]
November 16, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raul Arellano opening brief due 01/18/2022. Appellee R. Blahnik answering brief due 02/18/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12289016] (RT) [Entered: 11/16/2021 01:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RAUL ARELLANO
Represented By: Raul Arellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: R. BLAHNIK
Represented By: Carson Richard Niello
Represented By: Sylvie Snyder Esquire
Represented By: Quyen Thai
Represented By: Anne M. Kammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?