Theorem, Inc. v. Citrusbyte, LLC, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: THEOREM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: CITRUSBYTE, LLC and TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE SERVICES, LLC
Case Number: 21-56289
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2022 Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellee Theorem, Inc. response opposing motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 01/26/2022. [12352742] [21-56289] (Hinks, Matthew) [Entered: 01/26/2022 06:17 PM]
January 25, 2022 Filing 17 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC. Date of service: 01/25/2022. [12351369] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:41 PM]
January 25, 2022 Filing 16 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC. Date of service: 01/25/2022. [12351366] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 01/25/2022 10:33 PM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC Motion to consolidate cases 21-56385. Date of service: 01/24/2022. [12349395] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:46 PM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 14 Added Attorney(s) Benjamin Clements for party(s) Appellant Citrusbyte, LLC Appellant Technical Performance Services, LLC. [12349377] (RL) [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:42 PM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Benjamin W. Clements (TROYGOULD PC; 1801 Century Park East, 16th Floor; Los Angeles, CA 90067) for Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC. Date of service: 01/24/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12349365] [21-56289] (Clements, Benjamin) [Entered: 01/24/2022 03:37 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 12 Filed order (MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN) The court has received appellants motion to stay the district courts preliminary injunction pending appeal, as well as appellees preliminary opposition to the motion. Appellees formal response to the motion is due January 26, 2022. The reply in support of the motion is due January 28, 2022. Appellants request for a temporary stay of the challenged injunction pending disposition of the stay motion is denied. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due January 25, 2022. The answering brief is due February 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [12348155] [21-56289, 21-56385] (OC) [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:12 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC reply to response (). Date of service: 01/21/2022. [12348132] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 01/21/2022 06:44 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Theorem, Inc. response to motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 01/21/2022. [12346746] [21-56289] (Hinks, Matthew) [Entered: 01/21/2022 08:27 AM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 01/20/2022. [12346684] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 01/20/2022 11:55 PM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SH): The unopposed motion for extension of time to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. 7) is granted. The opening brief is due January 24, 2022. The answering brief is due February 21, 2022. The optional reply brief remains due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12320241] (OC) [Entered: 12/20/2021 10:07 AM]
December 16, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 01/24/2022. Date of service: 12/16/2021. [12318645] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 12/16/2021 10:35 PM]
December 2, 2021 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/02/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12304579]. [21-56289] (AD) [Entered: 12/02/2021 06:44 PM]
December 2, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Citrusbyte, LLC and Technical Performance Services, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/02/2021. [12304570] [21-56289] (Ulin, John) [Entered: 12/02/2021 05:48 PM]
November 30, 2021 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/30/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12301938]. [21-56289] (AD) [Entered: 11/30/2021 06:44 PM]
November 30, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Theorem, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/30/2021. [12301772] [21-56289] (Hinks, Matthew) [Entered: 11/30/2021 03:55 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed November 29, 2021 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due no later than December 27, 2021; the answering brief is due January 24, 2022 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12300378] (RT) [Entered: 11/29/2021 04:04 PM]
November 29, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [12299963] (JBS) [Entered: 11/29/2021 02:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Theorem, Inc. v. Citrusbyte, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: THEOREM, INC.
Represented By: Matthew Hinks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CITRUSBYTE, LLC
Represented By: John Charles Ulin Esquire
Represented By: Benjamin Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE SERVICES, LLC
Represented By: John Charles Ulin Esquire
Represented By: Benjamin Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?