Robert Lacambra v. Repbulic of the Philippines, et al
| ROBERT LACAMBRA |
| REPBULIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PHILIPPINE CONSULAR GENERAL OF SAN DIEGO, in his official and personal capacity, PHILIPPINE HONORARY CONSULAR GENERAL OF LOS ANGELES, in his offiicial and personal capacity and ROES, 1-20 inclusive |
| 21-56351 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 01/03/2022). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12367973] (CKP) [Entered: 02/11/2022 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on appellants statement received on December 20, 2021, and any further statement filed in response to this order. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12328837] (CKP) [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/21/2021 ORDER. Order certifying appeal is not taken in good faith [12323148] (RL) [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Robert Lacambra preemptory arguments to the Circuit Court's solicitation of the US District Court's opinion regarding the merits of this appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/20/2021. [12320801] (RL) [Entered: 12/20/2021 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12317836] (CKP) [Entered: 12/16/2021 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Lacambra opening brief due 02/15/2022. [12317057] (RT) [Entered: 12/15/2021 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
