Singh v. Garland
| SALINDER SINGH |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-57 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 60
MANDATE ISSUED N. Randy SMITH, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE [Entered: 08/29/2023 07:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 59
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (N. Randy SMITH, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE) PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 07/07/2023 09:35 AM]
|
|
Filing 58
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to N. Randy SMITH, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE. [Entered: 06/29/2023 10:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 57
ORDER FILED. The Court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on June 29, 2023, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 06/14/2023 01:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 56
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Bashir Ghazialam for Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 05/30/2023 11:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 55
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 54
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, June 29, 2023 - 9:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 04/17/2023 09:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 53
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for June 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [Entered: 02/24/2023 10:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 52
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 6-10 and 13-17, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/15/2022 08:51 AM]
|
|
Filing 51
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 49 by Petitioner Salinder Singh received. [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 50
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 49 by Petitioner Salinder Singh is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 11/04/2022 01:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 49
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 11/04/2022 08:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 48
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 47) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 11/4/2022. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/06/2022 09:01:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 47
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 10/05/2022 05:24:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 46
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 44 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/19/2022 03:45:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 45
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 44 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/14/2022 01:38:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 44
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:28:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 42) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due September 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/19/2022 03:09:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 42
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/04/2022 11:38:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 41
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 40) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due August 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/11/2022 04:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 40
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 38) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due July 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/10/2022 01:10:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 38
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/10/2022 08:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 36) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/17/2022 09:13:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/16/2022 07:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
TERMINATED participation of Marie Vanderbilt Robinson representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:59:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 34
ADDED Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:59:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Merrick B. Garland replacing Marie Vanderbilt Robinson. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 30 by Petitioner Salinder Singh received. [Entered: 03/09/2022 04:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 30 by Petitioner Salinder Singh is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/04/2022 04:16:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 03/04/2022 03:36:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached separate PDFs of brief and addendum] [Edited: 03/04/2022 04:14:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Motion to Reinstate (DE 28) granted.The order of dismissal for failure to prosecute (DE 27) is vacated, the petition for review is reinstated, and the stay of removal is restored. Petitioners request (included in DE. 28) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/15/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/16/2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/28/2022 01:27:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION to reinstate case filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 02/22/2022 06:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Dismissal for failure to file opening brief. [Entered: 02/18/2022 05:24:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Mary M. SCHROEDER, A. Wallace TASHIMA, Andrew D. HURWITZ Motion to Reconsider Nondispositive Order (DE 21) denied. [Entered: 11/05/2021 11:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Motion to Hold in Abeyance (DE 24) granted. [Entered: 10/15/2021 04:55:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION to hold case in abeyance filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/22/2021 06:03:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
RESPONSE to [MOTION to reconsider nondispositive order] (entry [21]) filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. (Court-entered filing to correct DE 22) [Entered: 09/16/2021 10:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
DEFECTIVE --- REPLY to Response to Motion to Transfer Petition for Review to Other Circuit (DE 16) filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 09/16/2021 09:37:00 AM] Wrong filing type used. Correct entry at DE #23 [Edited: 09/16/2021 01:04:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to reconsider nondispositive order filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/03/2021 04:40:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED Mary M. SCHROEDER, A. Wallace TASHIMA, Andrew D. HURWITZ Motion to Transfer Petition for Review to Other Circuit (DE 15) denied. Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/12/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/13/2021. [Entered: 08/13/2021 10:49:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 18) denied. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 08/13/2021 10:15:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 08/13/2021 09:31:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
REPLY to Response to Motion to Transfer Petition for Review to Other Circuit (entry 16) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/15/2021 10:19:00 AM] Attached PDF, resent notice. [Edited: 07/30/2021 09:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE to Motion to Transfer Petition for Review to Other Circuit (entry 15) filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 07/08/2021 10:45:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to transfer petition for review to other circuit filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/01/2021 10:26:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent. [Entered: 06/29/2021 04:52:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
RESPONSE to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (entry 12) filed by Petitioner Salinder Singh. [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:28:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/24/2021 10:13:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 06/23/2021 05:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/01/2021 07:52:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:39:00 PM] Resent NDA. [Edited: 05/24/2021 10:44:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ADDED Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 05/13/2021 11:26:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/13/2021 10:49:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/17/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/8/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/16/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/15/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/13/2021 09:27:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/12/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-57 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/13/2021 09:24:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/12/2021. [Entered: 05/12/2021 05:04:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/12/2021 05:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/12/2021 05:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/12/2021 05:02:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SALINDER SINGH | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Bashir Ghazialam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Joseph Anthony O'Connell |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
