Cuevas Delgadillo v. Garland
Petitioner: ALEJANDRO CUEVAS DELGADILLO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-574
Filed: August 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER FILED. Case No. 21-574 is reopened and petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 32) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This petition for review is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the agency acts as the mandate of this court. [Entered: 10/03/2023 10:05 AM]
September 25, 2023 Filing 32 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:08 PM]
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. 29), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 04/04/2023 04:36 PM]
March 29, 2023 Filing 30 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION. Respondent's Motion for Judicial Administrative Closure will be addressed by separate order. [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:57 AM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 29 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/27/2023 03:11 PM]
February 23, 2023 Filing 28 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Respondent Status Report due 3/23/2023. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 02/23/2023 02:49 PM]
January 24, 2023 Filing 27 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 1/31/2023, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Respondent Answering Brief due 3/27/2023. [Entered: 01/24/2023 10:50 AM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 26 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Respondent Status Report due 11/3/2022. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 10/13/2022 10:59 AM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 25 DEFECTIVE ---STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:27:00 PM] [Per the order at DE 24, the status report should be provided by email to all counsel and the Circuit Mediator and not filed with the court.] [Edited: 08/16/2022 03:26:00 PM] Removed PDF per Circuit Mediator's request.
July 25, 2022 Filing 24 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Petitioner Status Report due 8/15/2022, Respondent Status Report due 9/15/2022. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:40:00 AM]
June 17, 2022 Filing 23 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 7/13/2022, 12:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 06/17/2022 04:00:00 PM]
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/22/2022 03:18:00 PM]
April 21, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:32:00 PM]
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 4/21/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:17:00 AM]
March 22, 2022 Filing 19 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/22/2022 05:14:00 PM]
January 28, 2022 Filing 18 Paper copies (7) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo received. [Entered: 01/28/2022 02:59:00 PM]
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/24/2022 09:54:00 AM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:17:00 PM]
January 21, 2022 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:14:00 PM]--[Duplicate entry, missing addendum. Correct entry at DE 16] [Edited: 01/24/2022 09:52:00 AM]
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/21/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/22/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/22/2021 10:49:00 AM]
December 20, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 12/20/2021 02:07:00 PM]
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/22/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:28:00 PM]
November 22, 2021 Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Alejandro Cuevas Delgadillo. [Entered: 11/22/2021 11:42:00 AM]
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 10/13/2021 11:05:00 AM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/12/2021 10:36:00 AM]
September 3, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/03/2021 01:03:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 7 ADDED Michelle Regina Slack for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/24/2021 01:12:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michelle Regina Slack for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/24/2021 12:01:00 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/21/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 10/12/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/19/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/17/2021 02:11:00 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/17/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-574 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/17/2021 02:09:00 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/23/2021. [Entered: 08/17/2021 12:45:00 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/17/2021 12:44:00 PM]
August 17, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/17/2021 12:43:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cuevas Delgadillo v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ALEJANDRO CUEVAS DELGADILLO
Represented By: Gary Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Michelle Regina Slack
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?