Cuevas Perez v. Garland
| ANACELI CUEVAS PEREZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-602 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 39
MANDATE ISSUED Daniel P. COLLINS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr., Roopali H. DESAI [Entered: 12/26/2023 09:48 AM]
|
|
Filing 38
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Daniel P. COLLINS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr., Roopali H. DESAI) DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Daniel P. COLLINS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr., Roopali H. DESAI. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 10/05/2023 03:57 PM]
|
|
Filing 36
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Berc Agopoglu for Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. Hearing in Pasadena - Courtroom 1 in Pasadena, on 10/5/2023 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/30/2023 01:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 34
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/25/2023 02:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Thursday, October 5, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-602] [Entered: 07/24/2023 06:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 5, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-602] [Entered: 07/24/2023 03:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for October 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [21-602] [Entered: 06/22/2023 09:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 30
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 28 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 28 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:43:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 28
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/22/2022 08:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 26) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due September 26, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/15/2022 10:33:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 21 by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez received. [Entered: 04/28/2022 04:01:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due July 26, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:38:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/26/2022 11:45:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 21 by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 03/28/2022 02:26:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached consolidated PDF of addendum] [Edited: 03/28/2022 02:56:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 03/28/2022 07:14:00 AM]--[Duplicate entry, unacceptable exhibit attached. Correct entry is DE 21] [Edited: 03/28/2022 02:58:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 18) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/28/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/28/2022 05:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 02/28/2022 02:15:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 16) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/25/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/26/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/28/2022 09:31:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/10/2022 11:44:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 12/26/2021 02:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/27/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/25/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/22/2021 12:30:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Anaceli Cuevas Perez. [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:54:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/27/2021 01:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 7) not opposed. [Entered: 08/25/2021 08:48:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/24/2021 08:56:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 7; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 10/18/2021. [Entered: 08/23/2021 06:36:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/23/2021 02:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ADDED Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/23/2021 11:50:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/23/2021 11:27:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/27/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/26/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/25/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/23/2021 10:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/23/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-602 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/23/2021 10:14:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/26/2021. [Entered: 08/23/2021 06:51:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/23/2021 06:50:00 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cuevas Perez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANACELI CUEVAS PEREZ | |
| Represented By: | Berc Agopoglu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
