Corrales Corrales v. Garland
Petitioner: JOSE CORRALES CORRALES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-625
Filed: August 24, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 28, 2023 CORRALES CORRALES V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MANDATE ISSUED Milan D. SMITH, Jr., David F. Hamilton, Daniel P. COLLINS [Entered: 08/21/2023 10:49 AM]
June 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Milan D. SMITH, Jr., David F. Hamilton, Daniel P. COLLINS) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 06/28/2023 10:24 AM]
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 36 SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Milan D. SMITH, Jr., David F. Hamilton, Daniel P. COLLINS. [Entered: 06/06/2023 12:23 PM]
May 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER FILED. The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Therefore, this matter is ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument on Tuesday, June 6, 2023, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners motion to submit this case, Dkt. No. 32, is GRANTED. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:21 PM]
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/25/2023 10:05 AM]
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Tuesday, June 6, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 03/27/2023 10:29 AM]
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MOTION to submit case on briefs without oral argument filed by Petitioner Jose Corrales Corrales. [Entered: 03/10/2023 12:01 PM]
February 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 31 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for June 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 02/24/2023 11:02 AM]
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 6-10 and March 13-17, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/15/2022 08:53 AM]
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/20/2022 10:09 AM]
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/20/2022 08:44 AM]
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:19:00 PM]
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 25 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/26/2022 12:51:00 PM]
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/26/2022 12:13:00 PM]
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 26, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/03/2022 04:45:00 PM]
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/02/2022 06:43:00 PM]
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 11, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/04/2022 05:23:00 PM]
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/04/2022 12:58:00 PM]
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Answering Brief (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 4/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/22/2022 03:34:00 PM]
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/22/2022 07:09:00 AM]
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 2/25/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/09/2021 03:46:00 PM]
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/09/2021 10:21:00 AM]
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TERMINATED participation of Joseph Anthony O'Connell representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/06/2021 09:44:00 AM]
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ADDED Sarai Aldana for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/06/2021 09:43:00 AM]
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarai Aldana for Merrick B. Garland replacing Joseph Anthony O'Connell, replacing OIL. [Entered: 12/06/2021 07:36:00 AM]
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarai Aldana for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/06/2021 07:24:00 AM]
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Petitioner Jose Corrales Corrales received. [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:50:00 PM]
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK ORDER. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Petitioner Jose Corrales Corrales is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/29/2021 09:53:00 AM]
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Corrales Corrales. [Entered: 10/28/2021 01:56:00 PM]
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 1) not opposed. [Entered: 10/20/2021 03:31:00 PM]
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/16/2021 11:26:00 AM]
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ADDED Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2021 02:31:00 PM]
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/25/2021 12:47:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/28/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 10/19/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/29/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/26/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:51:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/24/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-625 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:50:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/29/2021. [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:33:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:32:00 PM]
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/24/2021 04:31:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Corrales Corrales v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE CORRALES CORRALES
Represented By: Shannon Englert, AT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Sarai Aldana
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Ms. Marie Vanderbilt Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?