Santiago-Mateo v. Garland
| MANUEL ANGEL SANTIAGO-MATEO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-632 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 46
MANDATE ISSUED Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS [Entered: 05/02/2023 08:30 AM]
|
|
Filing 45
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 03/10/2023 11:16 AM]
|
|
Filing 44
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS. [Entered: 03/08/2023 10:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER FILED. The court unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. The case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on March 8, 2023, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 02/15/2023 03:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 42
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/15/2023 12:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 41
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Emily Neubert for Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 40
ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Emily Neubert for Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Emily Neubert representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:32 AM]
|
|
Filing 38
ADDED Counsel for Respondent Emily Neubert for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Emily Neubert for Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:23 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Emily Neubert for Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:21 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Reyna Tanner for Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
ADDED Counsel for Respondent Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/14/2023 09:06 AM]
|
|
Filing 33
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:57 AM]
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 8, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 12/27/2022 11:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Reyna Tanner. (Court-entered filing to correct DE 30) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:08 AM]
|
|
Filing 30
DEFECTIVE --- STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. Wrong filing type used. Correct entry at DE 31 [Entered: 12/14/2022 04:26 PM] [Edited: 12/15/2022 09:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 6-10 and March 13-17, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 26 by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo received. [Entered: 07/14/2022 04:42:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 26 by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:44:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [COURT ENTERED FILING to replace DE 25] [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:40:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:30:00 PM]--[Wrong filing type used. Correct entry is DE 26] [Edited: 07/07/2022 04:42:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 07/05/2022 05:27:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/27/2022 02:34:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 20) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 27, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:30:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 18) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 4/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/21/2022 06:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
TERMINATED participation of Edward C. Durant representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2022 12:07:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ADDED Rachel Louise Browning for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2022 12:06:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland replacing Edward C. Durant. [Entered: 01/31/2022 06:34:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo received. [Entered: 01/28/2022 04:21:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 01/26/2022 11:30:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 01/26/2022 11:18:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/27/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/21/2021 03:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 12/16/2021 11:56:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/29/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/23/2021 04:32:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Manuel Angel Santiago-Mateo. [Entered: 11/23/2021 11:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/20/2021 12:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ADDED Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/26/2021 08:29:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward C. Durant for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/26/2021 04:12:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/29/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/29/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/25/2021 02:37:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/25/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-632 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/25/2021 02:35:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 8/2/2021. [Entered: 08/25/2021 02:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/25/2021 01:58:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
