Tomas-Ramirez v. Garland
| ARNULFO TOMAS-RAMIREZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-656 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 47
MANDATE ISSUED Ronald Lee Gilman, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS [Entered: 05/08/2023 06:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 46
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Ronald Lee Gilman, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 03/14/2023 11:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 45
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Ronald Lee Gilman, Danielle J. FORREST, Holly A. THOMAS. [Entered: 03/10/2023 11:17 AM]
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER FILED. The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on March 10, 2023, in Pasadena, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 02/22/2023 02:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 43
ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Eliott Nazarian for Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 02/21/2023 01:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 42
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eliott Nazarian for Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 02/20/2023 04:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 41
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eliott Nazarian for Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 02/20/2023 04:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 40
MOTION to submit case on briefs without oral argument filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/17/2023 06:05 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, March 10, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 12/27/2022 11:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 38
TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Petitioner Eduardo Zuniga Herrera representing Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 36) of Eduardo Zuniga Herrera to withdraw as counsel for petitioner is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that petitioner is proceeding pro se. The Clerk will provide a copy of the pro se case opening packet, along with a copy of this order, to petitioner at his last known address: Arnulfo Tomas Ramirez, 334 W 89th St, Los Angeles, CA 90003. [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 36
MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Eduardo Zuniga Herrera for Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:15 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 6-10 and March 13-17, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/15/2022 08:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 32 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/02/2022 03:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 32 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/08/2022 09:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 32
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/08/2022 09:40:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Respondent's motion (Docket Entry No. 30) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due August 8, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/06/2022 03:01:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/01/2022 12:28:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 28) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due July 8, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/02/2022 01:23:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/01/2022 09:29:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 6/8/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/04/2022 02:36:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/03/2022 09:15:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
TERMINATED participation of Rachel Louise Browning representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2022 12:13:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
ADDED Edward C. Durant for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2022 12:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward C. Durant for Merrick B. Garland replacing Rachel Louise Browning. [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:42:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez received. [Entered: 03/18/2022 02:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/11/2022 09:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 03/10/2022 06:07:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 18) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/10/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/9/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/08/2022 11:45:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 02/07/2022 05:34:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ADDED Eduardo Zuniga Herrera for Petitioner Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:10:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eduardo Zuniga Herrera for Arnulfo Tomas-Ramirez. [Entered: 01/07/2022 04:43:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Diarmuid F. O'SCANNLAIN, Sidney R. THOMAS Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 4) denied. [Entered: 12/08/2021 09:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 10/25/2021 03:59:00 PM] COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to match order [Edited: 10/25/2021 04:04:00 PM] [Edited: 10/26/2021 09:42:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/22/2021 05:42:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE to Mail Returned (entry 10) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. (Petitioner's address updated) [Entered: 10/21/2021 11:55:00 AM] [Edited: 10/21/2021 01:14:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/27/2021 01:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: Respondent's counsel, for forwarding [Entered: 09/22/2021 09:32:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted. [Entered: 09/08/2021 01:43:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ADDED Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 08/30/2021 09:56:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/30/2021 08:36:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/1/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 10/22/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/30/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/31/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:51:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/27/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-656 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:49:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:10:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tomas-Ramirez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ARNULFO TOMAS-RAMIREZ | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Eliott Nazarian |
| Represented By: | Eduardo Zuniga Herrera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Edward C. Durant |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
