Urmancheev v. Garland
| ALIM S. URMANCHEEV |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-664 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 100
PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 99.] [Entered: 10/03/2023 04:16 PM]
|
|
Filing 99
MOTION to substitute petition for rehearing filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [COURT UPDATE: Updated entry to reflect content of filing; substitute petition for panel rehearing and rehearng en banc resubmitted at DE 100.] [Entered: 10/03/2023 03:24 PM] [Edited: 10/12/2023 04:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 98
PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 10/02/2023 11:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 97
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Eugene E. Siler, Kim McLane WARDLAW, Milan D. SMITH, Jr.) The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied. PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 08/17/2023 11:14 AM] [Edited: 08/17/2023 11:30 AM]
|
|
Filing 96
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Eugene E. Siler, Kim McLane WARDLAW, Milan D. SMITH, Jr.. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 07/19/2023 05:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 95
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/19/2023 01:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 94
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/17/2023 03:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 93
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Kari Hong for Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/02/2023 10:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 92
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Andrew Jacob Oliveira for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/20/2023 06:27 AM]
|
|
Filing 91
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 06/16/2023 10:11 AM]
|
|
Filing 90
AUTHORIZATION for Pro Bono attorney(s) Kari Hong. See attached letter for details. [Entered: 06/05/2023 10:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 89
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 87 by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 05/31/2023 02:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 88
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 87 by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/26/2023 11:13 AM]
|
|
Filing 87
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 05/25/2023 09:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 86
ORDER FILED. Petitioners Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 85) is GRANTED. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted. [Entered: 05/24/2023 11:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 85
MOTION to extend time to to file reply brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 05/19/2023 07:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 84
TEXT ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion to extend time to file reply brief (Docket Entry #83) is granted. [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 83
MOTION to extend time to to file reply brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 05/12/2023 11:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 82
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, July 21, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 05/08/2023 12:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 81
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 80) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 05/15/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/10/2023 03:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 80
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 04/10/2023 10:22 AM]
|
|
Filing 79
RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Andrew Jacob Oliveira. [Entered: 03/31/2023 06:17 AM]
|
|
Filing 78
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for July 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 03/30/2023 02:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 77
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 75 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 03/29/2023 04:05 PM]
|
|
Filing 76
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 75 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/23/2023 10:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 75
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 74
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 73) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/07/2023 08:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 73
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/07/2023 08:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 72
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 67 by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev received. [Entered: 01/06/2023 02:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 71
TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Sharon Michele Clay representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/04/2023 01:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 70
ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew Jacob Oliveira for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/04/2023 01:27 PM]
|
|
Filing 69
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Jacob Oliveira for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Sharon Michele Clay. [Entered: 01/04/2023 01:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 68
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 67 by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 12/29/2022 03:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 67
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 12/29/2022 12:57 PM]
|
|
Filing 66
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motions (Docket Entry Nos. 64, 65) for an extension of time to file the opening brief are granted. Given the length of previous extensions, the court is not inclined to grant any further motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief. The opening brief is due December 29, 2022. The answering brief is due February 27, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/22/2022 09:05 AM]
|
|
Filing 65
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 12/19/2022 04:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 64
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 12/09/2022 04:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 63
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 62) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 9, 2022. The answering brief is due February 7, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/25/2022 12:16 PM]
|
|
Filing 62
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 11/22/2022 03:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 61
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 60) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 22, 2022. The answering brief is due January 23, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:07 PM]
|
|
Filing 60
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 59
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 58) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 17, 2022. The answering brief is due January 17, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/28/2022 03:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 58
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 10/27/2022 05:05 PM]
|
|
Filing 57
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 56) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 27, 2022. The answering brief is due December 27, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:44:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 56
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 55
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 54) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 6, 2022. The answering brief is due December 5, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:34:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 54
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 09/26/2022 10:56:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 53
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 52) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 26, 2022. The answering brief is due November 25, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/13/2022 04:37:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 52
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 09/12/2022 01:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 51
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 50) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 12, 2022. The answering brief is due November 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/11/2022 09:52:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 50
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 08/10/2022 03:55:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 49
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 48) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 11, 2022. The answering brief is due October 11, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:07:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 48
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 08/05/2022 10:36:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 47
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motionw (Docket Entry Nos. 45, 46) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 5, 2022. The answering brief is due October 4, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/04/2022 04:45:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 46
SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (entry 45) filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 08/01/2022 10:13:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 45
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 08/01/2022 09:35:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 44
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/29/2022 11:06:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 42) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 29, 2022. The answering brief is due September 27, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:21:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 42
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/22/2022 08:50:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 41
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 40) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 22, 2022. The answering brief is due September 20, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/18/2022 11:22:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 40
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/15/2022 11:01:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 38) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 15, 2022. The answering brief is due September 13, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/08/2022 02:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 38
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 07/08/2022 09:44:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 36) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 8, 2022. The answering brief is due September 6, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/29/2022 03:39:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 36
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 06/28/2022 07:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 34) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 28, 2022. The answering brief is due August 29, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/15/2022 04:37:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 34
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 06/14/2022 08:37:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 32) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 21, 2022. The answering brief is due August 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/20/2022 01:23:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 05/19/2022 04:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 30) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 19, 2022. The answering brief is due July 18, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/09/2022 04:35:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 05/05/2022 04:13:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 28) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 5, 2022. The answering brief is due July 5, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/26/2022 03:44:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 04/25/2022 03:52:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 26) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 25, 2022. The answering brief is due June 24, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/04/2022 05:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 04/04/2022 01:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 24) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 11, 2022. The answering brief is due June 10, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/22/2022 11:55:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 03/20/2022 05:31:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 16) to file a late supplemental motion for a stay of removal is granted. The supplemental motion for a stay of removal has been filed at Docket Entry No. 15. The governments motion (Docket Entry No. 21) to withdraw the governments motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and opposition to the motion to stay removal is granted. The motion and opposition filed at Docket Entry Nos. 19 and 20 are deemed withdrawn. The governments withdrawal of the opposition to the motion to stay removal is treated as a statement of non-opposition to the motion to stay removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 28, 2022. The answering brief is due May 27, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:33:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 03/04/2022 04:40:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to withdraw party filing filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/11/2022 09:33:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/11/2022 07:08:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/11/2022 07:02:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/14/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/13/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/10/2022 02:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 02/10/2022 02:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to accept late filing filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 02/07/2022 02:42:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 02/07/2022 02:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 13; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 2/11/2022. [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:59:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:51:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
ADDED Kari Hong for Petitioner Alim S. Urmancheev. [Entered: 01/14/2022 12:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Counsel selected. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/11/2022. Respondent Answering Brief due 4/12/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/13/2022 04:55:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 9) granted. [Entered: 11/15/2021 12:13:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/25/2021 03:44:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 10/01/2021 08:58:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 2) granted. [Entered: 09/08/2021 03:14:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ADDED Sharon Michele Clay for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:53:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sharon Michele Clay for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/02/2021 11:50:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/4/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/3/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/1/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/30/2021 02:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/30/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-664 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/30/2021 02:16:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/30/2021 01:13:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/30/2021 01:12:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Urmancheev v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ALIM S. URMANCHEEV | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Kari Hong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Sharon Michele Clay |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jacob Oliveira |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
