Karina Martinez-Nunez v. Jeffrey Rosen
KARINA JAZMIN MARTINEZ-NUNEZ |
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General |
21-70034 |
January 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11957916]. [21-70034] (CD) [Entered: 01/08/2021 05:40 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Order to show cause docket fee due [11957600] (NA) [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:33 PM] |
Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Anthony Cardozo Payne for party(s) Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen, in case 21-70034. [11956948] (JFF) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:27 AM] |
Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Lance Lomond Jolley for party(s) Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen, in case 21-70034. [11956934] (JFF) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:24 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Anthony, C., Payne (U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division P.O. Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044-0878) for Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen. Date of service: 01/07/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11956912] [21-70034] (Payne, Anthony) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:17 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lance, Jolley (U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division P.O. Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044-0878) for Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen. Date of service: 01/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11956907] [21-70034] (Jolley, Lance) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:14 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? YES. Certified Administrative Record due 02/12/2021. Response to motion for stay due 03/05/2021 for Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 04/13/2021 for Karina Jazmin Martinez-Nunez. Respondent brief due 06/14/2021 for Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11956756] (MAP) [Entered: 01/08/2021 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Karina Martinez-Nunez v. Jeffrey Rosen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General | |
Represented By: | OIL |
Represented By: | Anthony Cardozo Payne |
Represented By: | Lance Lomond Jolley Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KARINA JAZMIN MARTINEZ-NUNEZ | |
Represented By: | Sergio Valdovinos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.