A Community Voice, et al v. USEPA, et al
| UNITED PARENTS AGAINST LEAD NATIONAL, NEW YORK CITY COALITION TO END LEAD POISONING, CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, HEALTHY HOMES COLLABORATIVE, NEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION, A COMMUNITY VOICE, WE ACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE and SIERRA CLUB |
| ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| 21-70080 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioners A Community Voice, California Communities Against Toxics, Healthy Homes Collaborative, New Jersey Citizen Action, New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Sierra Club, United Parents Against Lead National and We Act For Environmental Justice Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/21/2021. Petitioner brief due 04/05/2021 for A Community Voice, California Communities Against Toxics, Healthy Homes Collaborative, New Jersey Citizen Action, New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Sierra Club, United Parents Against Lead National and We Act For Environmental Justice. Respondent brief due 05/04/2021 for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11963582] (JMR) [Entered: 01/14/2021 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
