Jenny Sandoval-Villegas, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen
| CRISTOFER ALEXANDER SEGURA-SANDOVAL and JENNY MARISOL SANDOVAL-VILLEGAS |
| JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General |
| 21-70084 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| JENNY SANDOVAL-VILLEGAS, ET AL V. MERRICK GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Added Attorney Kristen H. Blosser for party Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen. [11964886] (DJV) [Entered: 01/15/2021 07:22 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kristen H. Blosser (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen. Date of service: 01/15/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11964871] [21-70084] (Blosser, Kristen) [Entered: 01/15/2021 06:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 02/18/2021. Response to motion for stay due 03/11/2021 for Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 04/19/2021 for Jenny Marisol Sandoval-Villegas and Cristofer Alexander Segura-Sandoval. Respondent brief due 06/18/2021 for Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11964372][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 01/14/2021 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 01/14/2021 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
