Peter Wilson v. Matthew Atchley
| PETER WILSON |
| MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden |
| 21-70303 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Peter Wilson motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/20/2021. [12000927][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/12/2021 by BY](Original sent to SMS) (BY) [Entered: 02/11/2021 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) [12000919][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/12/2021 by BY](Original sent to SMS) (BY) [Entered: 02/11/2021 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Peter Wilson v. Matthew Atchley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: PETER WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Peter Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
