Brenda Marcial Vazquez, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
| BRENDA JASMIN MARCIAL VAZQUEZ, M.G.M., O.E.G.M. and MA.G.M. |
| ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General |
| 21-70434 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [12017345]. [21-70434] (CD) [Entered: 02/25/2021 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-70434: IFP Pending In COA] ). [12016495] (JFF) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Brenda Jasmin Marcial Vazquez, M.G.M., MA.G.M. and O.E.G.M. Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 02/25/2021. [12016466] [21-70434] (Villacorta, Javier) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. COUNSELED. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 03/31/2021. Petitioner opening brief due 06/01/2021 for Brenda Jasmin Marcial Vazquez, et al. Respondent brief due 07/29/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [12016238] (MAP) [Entered: 02/25/2021 08:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
