Victor Gomez-Monge, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
| ALISSON MICHEL GOMEZ-ACEITUNO, VICTOR ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ACEITUNO, VICTOR RAMON GOMEZ-MONGE and KENIA MARIELA ACEITUNO-PAZ |
| ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General |
| 21-70457 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Brendan Paul Hogan for party(s) Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson, in case 21-70457. [12019957] (DJV) [Entered: 03/01/2021 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brendan P. Hogan (U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation P.O. Box 878, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson. Date of service: 03/01/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12019860] [21-70457] (Hogan, Brendan) [Entered: 03/01/2021 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 04/02/2021. Response to motion for stay due 04/23/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 06/01/2021 for Victor Ramon Gomez-Monge, et al. Respondent brief due 08/02/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [12018360][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 03/01/2021 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 02/26/2021 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.