Santos Mendoza-Ramos, et al v. Merrick Garland
| SANTOS MENDOZA-RAMOS and E. B. M.M. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 21-70525 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Robert M. Wilkinson substituted by Merrick B. Garland effective 03/11/2021 [Created 03/11/2021 by AUTOUPD][12038778]. [21-70525] (CD) [Entered: 03/11/2021 06:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [12026739]. [21-70525] (CD) [Entered: 03/05/2021 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 04/09/2021. Response to motion for stay due 04/30/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 06/08/2021 for E. B. M.M. and Santos Mendoza-Ramos. Respondent brief due 08/09/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [12026691] (HH) [Entered: 03/05/2021 04:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
