AIMS, et al v. USDEA, et al
ERINN BALDESCHWILER, MICHAL BLOOM, ADVANCED INTEGRATIVE MEDICAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE, PLLC and SUNIL AGGARWAL, Doctor, MD, PhD, FAAPMR |
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and D. CHRISTOPHER EVANS, in his official capacity as acting Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration |
21-70544 |
March 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
![]() |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/09/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12029441]. [21-70544] (AD) [Entered: 03/09/2021 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Michal Bloom, Erinn Baldeschwiler, Sunil Aggarwal and AIMS Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/09/2021. [12029383] [21-70544] (Williams, James) [Entered: 03/09/2021 12:17 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioners Advanced Integrative Medical Science Institute, PLLC, Sunil Aggarwal, Erinn Baldeschwiler and Michal Bloom Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/15/2021. Petitioner brief due 05/27/2021 for Advanced Integrative Medical Science Institute, PLLC, Sunil Aggarwal, Erinn Baldeschwiler and Michal Bloom. Respondent brief due 06/28/2021 for D. Christopher Evans, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12028345] (JMR) [Entered: 03/08/2021 04:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.