Diana Rubio Villalobos, et al v. Merrick Garland
C.G.L.R., K.L.R., DIANA LAURA RUBIO VILLALOBOS and F.R.V. |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
21-70643 |
March 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [12045249]. [21-70643] (CD) [Entered: 03/17/2021 05:40 PM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Joseph Anthony O'Connell for party(s) Respondent Merrick B. Garland, in case 21-70643. [12045068] (JFF) [Entered: 03/17/2021 04:10 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joseph A. O'Connell (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, PO Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Date of service: 03/17/2021. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12045048] [21-70643] (O'Connell, Joseph) [Entered: 03/17/2021 04:04 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. COUNSELED. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 04/21/2021. Petitioner opening brief due 06/21/2021 for Diana Laura Rubio Villalobos, et al. Respondent brief due 08/19/2021 for Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [12044657] (MAP) [Entered: 03/17/2021 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.