Jose Martin del Campo Romero v. Merrick Garland
JOSE ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO ROMERO |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
21-70902 |
April 14, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. PRO SE. Petitioner detained? YES. Certified Administrative Record due 05/19/2021. Petitioner opening brief due 07/19/2021 for Jose Antonio Martin del Campo Romero. Respondent brief due 09/16/2021 for Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [12073855] (MAP) [Entered: 04/14/2021 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jose Martin del Campo Romero v. Merrick Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOSE ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO ROMERO | |
Represented By: | Jose Antonio Martin del Campo Romero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.