Computer Sciences Corporation v. USDOL, et al
Petitioner: COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Respondent: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Case Number: 21-71068
Filed: May 7, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2021 Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. By May 28, 2021, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform Roxane Ashe, Circuit Mediator, by email at [email protected], of their clients views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, from the other parties in the case. This communication shall not be filed with the court. [12113969] (JBS) [Entered: 05/14/2021 03:59 PM]
May 14, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/14/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12113382]. [21-71068] (AD) [Entered: 05/14/2021 12:44 PM]
May 14, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioner Computer Sciences Corporation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/14/2021. [12112936] [21-71068] (Linzy, Rachel) [Entered: 05/14/2021 08:55 AM]
May 7, 2021 Filing 1 ENTRY UPDATED. FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioner Computer Sciences Corporation Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/14/2021. Petitioner brief due 07/26/2021 for Computer Sciences Corporation. Respondent brief due 08/25/2021 for Administrative Review Board and U.S. Department of Labor. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12106398] (WL) [Entered: 05/07/2021 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Computer Sciences Corporation v. USDOL, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Represented By: Jamila Gleason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Represented By: Jamila Gleason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Represented By: Samuel Zurik III
Represented By: Rachel E. Linzy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?