Center for Food Safety, et al v. USEPA, et al
Petitioner: CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his offical capacity as Administrator
Case Number: 21-71180
Filed: July 16, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2021 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/23/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12181398]. [21-71180] (AD) [Entered: 07/23/2021 12:44 PM]
July 23, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/23/2021. [12181227] [21-71180] (Van Saun, Amy) [Entered: 07/23/2021 11:09 AM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety corporate disclosure statement. Date of service: 07/19/2021. [12175802] [21-71180] (Van Saun, Amy) [Entered: 07/19/2021 09:53 AM]
July 16, 2021 Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/23/2021. Petitioner brief due 10/04/2021 for Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety. Respondent brief due 11/03/2021 for Michael Regan and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12175237] (HH) [Entered: 07/16/2021 04:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Center for Food Safety, et al v. USEPA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY
Represented By: George Andreas Kimbrell Esquire
Represented By: Amy Luisa Van Saun Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Represented By: George Andreas Kimbrell Esquire
Represented By: Amy Luisa Van Saun Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Represented By: Jessica O'Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHAEL REGAN, in his offical capacity as Administrator
Represented By: Jessica O'Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?