Extiwuen Orozco-Montoya v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
| EXTIWUEN OROZCO-MONTOYA |
| ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of ICE, TRACY RENAUD, Acting Director of USCIS, SARAH SALDANA, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, ICE and LUIS ROSA, Jr., Warden, Pahrump Detention Center |
| 21-71284 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD Petitioner has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 habeas petition and emergency request for a temporary restraining order. This petition is duplicative of a petition and emergency request that was properly filed in the District Court for the District of Nevada, 2:21-cv-01730-RFB-EJY. We therefore dismiss this petition. The emergency request for a temporary restraining order (Docket Entry No. 2) is denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12234552] (JPD) [Entered: 09/21/2021 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Extiwuen Orozco-Montoya motion for a temporary Restraining Order by a Person in Federal Custody. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/20/2021. [12234206] (BY) [Entered: 09/21/2021 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12234191][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 09/21/2021 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 09/21/2021 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
