Alfaro Moncada v. Garland
| JOSE ALFARO MONCADA and JOSE O. ALFARO DE LEON |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-714 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Motion to Administratively Close Case (DE 14) granted. [Entered: 12/16/2021 11:31:00 AM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/15/2021 03:58:00 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/12/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/14/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/10/2021 04:00:00 PM]
|
| Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose O. Alfaro de Leon, Petitioner Jose Alfaro Moncada. [Entered: 12/10/2021 03:42:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 09/29/2021 07:44:00 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:34:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/15/2021 07:38:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 09/09/2021 09:01:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/09/2021 06:00:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/09/2021 05:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/13/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 11/3/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/13/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/8/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-714 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 8/16/2021. [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:00:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
