G. Smith v. USDC-ORMIn re: G. Smith v. USDC-ORM
| G. SMITH |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, MEDFORD |
| In re: G. SMITH, JILL LIMERICK, JAMES SANSONE and BARBARA WILT |
| 21-71424 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12316002] (WL) [Entered: 12/14/2021 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner G. Smith Motion to exceed Writ of Mandamus word count. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/10/2021. [12313948] (HH) [Entered: 12/13/2021 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner G. Smith EMERGENCY Motion for a Stay of Discovery and Trial. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/10/2021. [12313936] (HH) [Entered: 12/13/2021 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12313918] (HH) [Entered: 12/13/2021 11:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
