Martin-Mendoza v. Garland
| ORALIA MARTIN-MENDOZA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-773 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 38 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Jessica E. Burns for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Hearing in Pasadena - Courtroom 1 in Pasadena, on 12/8/2023 9:30:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 09/26/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, December 8, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-773] [Entered: 09/24/2023 06:20 AM] |
| Filing 36 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for December 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [21-773] [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 35 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for November 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [21-773] [Entered: 07/18/2023 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 34 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 32 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 03/06/2023 04:11 PM] |
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 32 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 32 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/01/2023 11:53 AM] |
|
Filing 31
ORDER FILED. Respondent's motion (Docket Entry No. 30) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due March 1, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/16/2023 04:50 PM]
|
| Filing 30 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/15/2023 10:20 AM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Respondent's motion (Docket Entry No. 28) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due February 22, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/13/2023 04:42 PM]
|
| Filing 28 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/13/2023 09:48 AM] |
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 1/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/09/2022 08:54 AM]
|
| Filing 26 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/09/2022 06:43 AM] |
| Filing 25 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Rachel Louise Browning representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 24 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jessica E. Burns for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jessica E. Burns for Merrick B. Garland replacing Rachel Louise Browning. [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 22 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza received. [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:31 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/25/2022 09:31 AM]
|
| Filing 20 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 10/24/2022 09:52 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 24, 2022. The answering brief is due December 23, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/26/2022 04:59:00 PM]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:47:00 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 25, 2022. The answering brief is due September 23, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:41:00 AM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 04/26/2022 12:07:00 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/27/2022 01:49:00 PM]
|
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (entry 13) filed by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 01/27/2022 08:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 01/26/2022 05:57:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/27/2021 11:25:00 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 12/25/2021 10:32:00 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:26:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/15/2021 05:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Murray David Hilts for Oralia Martin-Mendoza. [Entered: 09/21/2021 08:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 09/21/2021 08:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Louise Browning for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/21/2021 04:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 10/25/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 11/15/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/25/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 2/22/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:34:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:31:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/20/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-773 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:30:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 09/20/2021 10:29:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Martin-Mendoza v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ORALIA MARTIN-MENDOZA | |
| Represented By: | Murray David Hilts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Ms. Jessica E. Burns |
| Represented By: | Ms. Rachel Louise Browning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
