Philip Bobbitt v. Milberg LLP, et al
| RONALD A. UITZ, MELVYN I. WEISS, ANDREW LUSTIGMAN, MICHAEL C. SPENCER, MILBERG LLP, JANINE LEE POLLACK, LUSTIGMAN FIRM, BRIAN C. KERR, UITZ & ASSOCIATES, SHELDON S. LUSTIGMAN and LEE A. WEISS |
| PHILIP BOBBITT |
| 21-80060 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Petitioners Brian C. Kerr, Milberg LLP, Janine Lee Pollack, Michael C. Spencer, Lee A. Weiss and Melvyn I. Weiss Correspondence: Supplemental Certificate of Service of Petition for Permission to Appeal Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f). Date of service: 06/02/2021 [12131286] [21-80060] (Singer, Gila) [Entered: 06/02/2021 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Gila S. Singer for party(s) Petitioner Milberg LLP Petitioner Lee A. Weiss Petitioner Melvyn I. Weiss Petitioner Janine Lee Pollack Petitioner Brian C. Kerr Petitioner Michael C. Spencer. [12130943] (RL) [Entered: 06/02/2021 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gila S. Singer (Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC, 485 Lexington Ave., 30th Fl., New York, NY 10017) for Petitioners Brian C. Kerr, Milberg LLP, Janine Lee Pollack, Michael C. Spencer, Lee A. Weiss and Melvyn I. Weiss. Date of service: 06/02/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12130937] [21-80060] (Singer, Gila) [Entered: 06/02/2021 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED ON 06/01/2021 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 06/01/2021. [12130590] (BY) [Entered: 06/02/2021 07:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
