Mace AbdullahIn re: Mace Abdullah
| In re: MACE ABDULLAH, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar, April 7, 1991 |
| 21-80067 |
| June 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): The court is informed that respondent Mace Abdullah has been suspended by the Supreme Court of California. Within 28 days of this order, respondent must either agree to a concurrent suspension or show cause why a concurrent suspension should not be imposed. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(b); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If the court does not receive a timely response to this order, respondent will be removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this court without further notice. The Clerk will serve a copy of this order on respondent by mail at 1055 E. Colorado Blvd, 5th Floor, Pasadena, California 91106. [12145168] (JBS) [Entered: 06/15/2021 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. [12144103] (BY) [Entered: 06/15/2021 08:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mace AbdullahIn re: Mace Abdullah | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: MACE ABDULLAH, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar, April 7, 1991 | |
| Represented By: | Mace Abdullah Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
