S. J. M.-D. C. v. Garland
| S. J. M.-D. C., A. J. C.-M. and P. D. C.-M. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-821 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| S. J. M.-D. C., ET AL. V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 55
MANDATE ISSUED Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY [Entered: 08/22/2023 08:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 54
ORDER FILED. Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY Petitioners motion to stay the mandate is DENIED. The stay of removal currently in place in the consolidated cases remains in effect in accordance with the Governments representations in its response to the motion. [Entered: 08/14/2023 10:32 AM]
|
|
Filing 53
REPLY to (DE 52) filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 08/09/2023 05:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 52
RESPONSE to (DE 51) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/07/2023 06:05 AM]
|
|
Filing 51
MOTION to stay the mandate filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 08/01/2023 05:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 50
ORDER FILED. Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Callahan and Bumatay have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Schroeder has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matters en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:43 AM]
|
|
Filing 49
PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 07/03/2023 07:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 48
TEXT CLERK ORDER: At the direction of the Court, each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. [Entered: 05/19/2023 09:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 47
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) PETITION IN 21-821 IS DENIED IN PART, GRANTED IN PART AND REMANDED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 05/19/2023 09:23 AM]
|
|
Filing 46
ORDER FILED. (Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) The Petitioners Motion to Seal Disposition is DENIED. [Entered: 05/19/2023 09:12 AM]
|
|
Filing 45
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Mary M. SCHROEDER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 04/19/2023 11:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 44
RESPONSE to Citation of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) (DE 43) filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 04/16/2023 08:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 43
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/13/2023 10:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 42
RESPONSE to Citation of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) (DE 41) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/12/2023 10:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 41
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 04/11/2023 07:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 40
SEALED ORDER FILED. SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT. [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 39
MOTION to file document under seal and proposed sealed document filed by Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 04/04/2023 11:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 38
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Rachel Berman-Vaporis for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/16/2023 09:26 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Erik Weber for Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 03/09/2023 10:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Erik Weber for Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M., Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C.. [Entered: 03/06/2023 09:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erik Weber for Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner P. D. C.-M., Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C.. [Entered: 03/06/2023 09:10 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 19, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. The motion to seal the disposition (Docket Entry No. 70 in No. 20-71799; Docket Entry No. 32 in No. 21-821) is referred to the panel that will consider the merits of these consolidated cases. [Entered: 06/29/2022 02:57:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
MOTION to file document under seal. [Entered: 06/13/2022 08:40:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 29 filed UNDER SEAL by Petitioners in case numbers 20-71799 and 21-821 received. [Entered: 06/10/2022 03:21:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief in Nos. 20-71799 and 21-821 submitted at DE 29 by Petitioners is filed UNDER SEAL. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/08/2022 01:48:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing UNDER SEAL by Petitioners. (Court-entered filing, brief originally submitted in DE 27) [Entered: 06/08/2022 01:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 65 in No. 20-71799; Docket Entry No. 27 in No. 21-821) to file under seal is granted. The Clerk will file under seal the reply brief for case No. 21-821 (included in Docket Entry No. 65 in No. 20-71799; included in Docket Entry No. 27 in No. 21-821). The Clerk will maintain the motion under seal. Briefing in these consolidated cases is complete. [Entered: 06/08/2022 10:16:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 27
MOTION to file document under seal. [Entered: 05/16/2022 08:54:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
Paper copies (6) of UNDER SEAL answering brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland in case numbers 20-71799 and 21-821 received. [Entered: 04/15/2022 10:14:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief in Nos. 20-71799 and 21-821 submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed UNDER SEAL. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 04/11/2022 03:29:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing UNDER SEAL by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. (Court-entered filing, brief originally submitted in DE19]) [Entered: 04/11/2022 03:23:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 58 in No. 20-71799; Docket Entry No. 19 in No. 21-821) to file under seal is granted. The Clerk will file under seal the answering brief for case No. 21-821 (included in Docket Entry No. 58 in No. 20-71799; included in Docket Entry No. 19 in No. 21-821). The Clerk will maintain the motion under seal. The optional reply brief for case No. 21-821 remains due May 16, 2022. [Entered: 04/11/2022 02:46:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 21) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 5/16/2022. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/05/2022 03:19:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file reply brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 04/04/2022 09:41:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
RESPONSE to Motion to File Document Under Seal (DE 19) filed by Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 04/04/2022 09:36:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to file document under seal. [Entered: 03/25/2022 02:07:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 and FILED UNDER SEAL by Petitioners in Nos. 20-71799 and 21-821 received. [Entered: 02/25/2022 01:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioners in Nos. 20-71799 and 21-821 is filed UNDER SEAL. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/23/2022 05:10:00 PM]--[Attached corrected PDF and updated docket text] [Edited: 02/24/2022 09:48:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing UNDER SEAL by Petitioners. (Court-entered filing, brief originally submitted in DE 14) [Entered: 02/23/2022 05:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Motion to File Document Under Seal (DE 14) granted. Respondent Answering Brief due 4/25/2022 [Entered: 02/22/2022 07:10:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to file document under seal. [Entered: 01/31/2022 09:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioners Opening Brief due 1/31/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/1/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/29/2021 02:42:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner A. J. C.-M., Petitioner S. J. M.-D. C., Petitioner P. D. C.-M.. [Entered: 11/29/2021 11:06:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED Motion to File Document Under Seal (DE 6) granted, Motion to Consolidate (DE 5) granted. [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:55:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 10/20/2021 07:01:00 AM] [Edited: 10/20/2021 02:31:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ADDED Rachel Berman-Vaporis for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/29/2021 09:26:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Berman-Vaporis for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/29/2021 05:12:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel Berman-Vaporis for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/29/2021 05:10:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to file document under seal. [Entered: 09/28/2021 12:14:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to consolidate filed by Petitioner's S. J. M.-D. C., A. J. C.-M., P. D. C.-M. [Entered: 09/27/2021 05:28:00 PM] COURT UPDATE: Redacted petitioners names per order at DE 11 [Edited: 10/22/2021 01:17:00 PM] [Edited: 10/26/2021 10:56:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/1/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 12/31/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/1/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:27:00 PM] Updated Petitioner details per Order at DE 11. [Edited: 10/26/2021 12:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 9/27/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-821 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/27/2021 02:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/1/2021. [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:54:00 PM] [Court provisionally locked per motion to seal] [Edited: 09/28/2021 02:12:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:53:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
