Gomez Palacios v. Garland
| MARTHA GOMEZ PALACIOS, MARIA BERNAL GOMEZ and ERNESTA BERNAL GOMEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-876 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| GOMEZ PALACIOS, ET AL. V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 47
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION WITH DISSENT (Richard C. TALLMAN, John B. OWENS, Bridget S. BADE) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 09/29/2023 09:48 AM]
|
|
Filing 46
RELEASED FROM MEDIATION. A panel referred this matter to mediation. Mediation efforts have been exhausted. Accordingly, this case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 09/18/2023 09:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 45
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text order) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/29/2023, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. [Entered: 08/01/2023 01:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 44
MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text order) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 7/31/2023, 10:00 am Pacific Time (originally 7/10/2023). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 07/07/2023 10:04 AM]
|
|
Filing 43
(text order) MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 7/10/2023, 1:30 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. [Entered: 06/15/2023 09:49 AM]
|
|
Filing 42
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 6/14/2023, 11:00 am Pacific Time. [Entered: 05/01/2023 03:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 41
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference, 5/1/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/21/2023 05:25 PM]
|
|
Filing 40
ORDER FILED. Richard C. TALLMAN, John B. OWENS, Bridget S. BADE It appears to the court that this case may be appropriate for referral to the Circuit Mediation Office. The Circuit Mediator will contact the parties to explore whether they wish to enter into settlement negotiations and provide a status report to the panel within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. If the parties do not agree to mediation, the case will be submitted. [Entered: 04/20/2023 09:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Richard C. TALLMAN, John B. OWENS, Bridget S. BADE. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 38
RESPONSE to Citation of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) (DE 36) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry #37]. [Entered: 04/13/2023 05:09 PM] [Edited: 04/14/2023 08:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 37
DEFECTIVE --- CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Wrong filing type used. See correct entry #38. [Entered: 04/13/2023 03:26 PM] [Edited: 04/13/2023 05:10 PM]
|
|
Filing 36
CITATION of supplemental authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 04/11/2023 06:35 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Benjamin Wiesinger for Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 03/30/2023 09:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Joseph D. Hardy for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/24/2023 07:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 33
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 19, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Ceremonial Courtroom - Scheduled Location: Phoenix View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 32
RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Benjamin Wiesinger. [Entered: 12/08/2022 09:58 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Phoenix, AZ. Please review the Phoenix sitting dates for April 17-21, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 12/08/2022 09:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 30
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 28 by Petitioners received. [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:00:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 28 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/26/2022 01:01:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 08/26/2022 12:38:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: backdated entry to reflect original date of submission. [Edited: 08/26/2022 12:57:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 08/25/2022 05:55:00 PM] Wrong filing event, correct entry at DE 28. [Edited: 08/26/2022 12:57:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 25) for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The reply brief is due August 29, 2022. [Entered: 07/13/2022 04:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
MOTION to extend time to to file reply brief filed by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 06/30/2022 05:42:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:05:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/09/2022 11:29:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/09/2022 07:18:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 19 by Petitioners Ernesta Bernal Gomez, Maria Bernal Gomez, and Martha Gomez Palacios received. [Entered: 04/18/2022 04:45:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 19 by Petitioners Ernesta Bernal Gomez, Maria Bernal Gomez, and Martha Gomez Palacios is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 04/12/2022 11:51:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 04/11/2022 07:29:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/11/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:36:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:21:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 15) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/9/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/06/2022 04:13:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Martha Gomez Palacios, Petitioner Maria Bernal Gomez, Petitioner Ernesta Bernal Gomez. [Entered: 01/06/2022 02:33:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 11/30/2021 02:10:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/30/2021 07:24:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 10/28/2021 09:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
FEE PAID by Pope and Associates, Receipt # 4709005210, money order number 1502571764. [Entered: 10/18/2021 03:30:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Filing Fees Due. [Entered: 10/13/2021 02:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ADDED Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/07/2021 12:06:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ADDED Joseph D. Hardy for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/07/2021 12:04:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/07/2021 11:58:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph D. Hardy for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/07/2021 11:56:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/10/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/1/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/10/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:49:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/6/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-876 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:47:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:10:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/22/2021. [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:08:00 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
