Castro-De Dubon v. Garland
Petitioner: FLOR DE MARIA CASTRO-DE DUBON and ANDREA JOHANNA DUBON-CASTRO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-896
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 23) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 06/15/2022 04:46:00 PM]
June 12, 2022 Filing 23 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/12/2022 09:32:00 AM]
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Respondent's motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 17, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:44:00 PM]
May 17, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/17/2022 02:48:00 PM]
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 5/18/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:13:00 PM]
April 12, 2022 Filing 19 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/12/2022 06:44:00 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 18 ADDED Kevin Conway for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/03/2022 10:44:00 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Conway for Merrick B. Garland replacing OIL. [Entered: 03/03/2022 08:01:00 AM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioners Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro and Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon received. [Entered: 02/23/2022 04:36:00 PM]
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro and Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/18/2022 07:50:00 AM]
February 16, 2022 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon, Petitioner Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro. [Entered: 02/16/2022 06:21:00 PM]
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/17/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/18/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:50:00 PM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon, Petitioner Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro. [Entered: 01/06/2022 12:56:00 PM]
December 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 12/09/2021 01:52:00 PM]
November 2, 2021 Filing 10 ADDED Susy J. Mancia for Petitioner Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro, Petitioner Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon. [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:08:00 PM]
November 2, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Susy J. Mancia for Flor de Maria Castro-De Dubon, Susy J. Mancia for Andrea Johanna Dubon-Castro. [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:04:00 PM]
October 29, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 10/29/2021 09:18:00 AM]
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 ADDED Sharon Michele Clay for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:53:00 AM]
October 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sharon Michele Clay for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:42:00 AM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/16/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/7/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/17/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/16/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:34:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 4 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt #4709005209) [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:32:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/12/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-896 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:27:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:21:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:21:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Castro-De Dubon v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FLOR DE MARIA CASTRO-DE DUBON
Represented By: Mrs. Susy J. Mancia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANDREA JOHANNA DUBON-CASTRO
Represented By: Mrs. Susy J. Mancia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Sharon Michele Clay
Represented By: Kevin Conway
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?