Kevin Lisle v. William Gittere, et al
| KEVIN JAMES LISLE |
| WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and AARON D. FORD |
| 21-99009 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): This appeal was filed while a timely Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4) motion was pending in the district court. The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4), and proceedings in this court will be stayed until the district court decides the October 6, 2021 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1994). The briefing schedule set on October 8, 2021 is vacated. Within 14 days after the district courts decision, appellant must notify this court in writing of the decision and state whether he wishes to move forward with this appeal. To challenge the decision on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A copy of this order will be sent to the district court. [12253360] (AF) [Entered: 10/12/2021 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin James Lisle opening brief due 12/06/2021. Appellees Aaron D. Ford and William Gittere answering brief due 02/04/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12252295] (BY) [Entered: 10/08/2021 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
